The deeper issues are ones I will encounter with any switch I would make being used to one "headspace" and shifting to a new one requires a bit of work for me. REAPER supports a vast range of hardware, digital formats and plugins, My issues with Reaper are sets of minor ones and some deeper ones. It provides an extensive set of features, but is a very small and lightweight application (the installer is less than 1 megabyte, and includes many effects and a sample project).REAPER is a complete digital audio production application for Windows and OS X, offering a full multitrack audio and MIDI recording, editing, processing, mixing and mastering toolset. REAPER is a powerful but sensible Windows application that lets you record, arrange, edit, and render multi-track waveform audio. Cockos REAPER v6.36 MacOS 14.00 MB.
Or Windows For Reaper Upgrade To TheThese instructions assume you have a compatible Reaper program installed running on I tried Logic, but between some oddities/bugs that were show-stoppers for me (such as the folders and *odd* time sigs bugs) and the Mac only aspect, I had to write it off (sadly).Reaper is a complete DAW application for Windows and Mac. We recommend that you upgrade to the latest version if you have not already done so. I mainly use reacomp, reaEq, of course the reagate is good, and the readelay is a pretty nice and clean sounding delay.Important: Panorama T-series Reaper integration is compatible with Reaper 4.59 or later. After several years of using reaper I still havent really tried a fraction of them, and there are many that I don't even know what are for. For composing, however, Cubase still fits best for me.Hi, fellow reaper users As you all know, reaper has a pretty huge list of stock plugins. Even today, I still find the PT workflow to "feel best" for (simple) record + mix.![]() ![]() (Maybe with Thunderbolt this will change).Your comment about "audio subsystem" don't make any sense. I needed the PCIe slots, and the performance using external boxes and Firewire was not good enough for pro use. The hardware is better quality and cheaper (the competition drives down the prices for high-grade components, whereas with Apple you get no choice).As far as "choosing" Mac Pros - there is almost no choice if you are running Pro Tools hardware. They are much cheaper, more stable, and more flexible. So, I am sorta surfing the event horizon with it, trying to slowly incorporate it.Beg to differ - I am running several W7 machines as well. Grindr app for macWindows is far more stable, far more secure and much better value. Windows back then was a hodgepodge of 16 and 32 bit code.But Macs are now Intel machines, and the codebase of Mac OS is based on a 30 year old technology (that was never designed for 64 bit). My 2008 Mac Pro was picked up cheap from a production house that was switching.When Mac OS first came out it was streets ahead of Windows, there's no dispute on that. Memory partitioning is far more important, and on Macs this is almost impossible to manage directly.As far as video, since the Final Cut Pro X debacle, hundreds of professional video editors are switching to W7/Adobe Premiere. TDM is TDM no matter what OS you are on. All pro apps use proprietary systems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJessica ArchivesCategories |